Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin is currently facing a tough challenger in his bid for re-election this November.  The most recent polls point to the two being tied for the position, but past experience says that Walker has an edge and could come out with a victory and retain his seat.  After all, he initially won his bid for governor back in 2010 in a blue state, and then won with even larger margins (53-46) when he faced a recall election in 2012 (though I have to say now that after speaking with a good friend, the recall election might not be a good indicator for whether or not he will win this November.  It was an effort to get people to vote Walker out on a “whim because of all of the horrible things he’s done for the middle class”.  Definitely food for thought that we should take into consideration).

All of this, along with his success in being popular in a state that has been typically lead by Democrats, and being successful in making Wisconsin a right to work state, gives him great recognition and power on the national level.  Whether he could make a successful bid for president in 2016 is currently questionable, though he does have some national support for such a campaign.  There is another position though, that all of the men and women preparing for a run for president in 2016, should have Walker’s name at the top of their list for.  And that is vice president.

It might not seem like a lot, but having someone like Walker on the ticket would make a candidate’s chances (especially a Romney or Romney-lite candidate) much better, as Walker is much more appealing to conservatives.  Also, he could help Republicans win over Wisconsin, a state that has been elusive to the party for many years, and gain some necessary electoral votes.

I hope that the candidate’s take Walker into serious consideration as the prepare to start up their bid for the highest office in the land next year.

About these ads
Posted by: Shawn_the_Writer | August 24, 2014

Border Crisis & Indictment Sets Rick Perry Up For Good Presidential Bid

As Gov. Rick Perry of Texas prepares to defend himself in court due to the politically motivated indictment from the Travis County DA’s office, people are wondering if the governor is now down for the count as far as his intended 2016 presidential bid.  I contend that he is not.

Perry has been building himself up quite a lot since his failed run for president in 2012.  How he his handily dealt with the Mexican border crisis and the president, and now how he has chosen to take the indictment on in stride.  He is taking the case seriously, but his mugshot gives the impression of a man who sees right through his accusers and could care less.  Not to mention how he has handled with Texas’ economy and having major business’ move into the state, one by one over the years due to the better economic climate.

Democrats should be very scared of Rick Perry as we get closer to the presidential primary, because all attempts to stop him has only built onto his momentum.  They have pretty much aided him in making people forget his ‘oops’ gaffe during the 2012 primary debates.

I am not saying that he will win the primary, but he is going to have a good wave of momentum and support going into the primary season starting summer 2015.  Maybe I’m overstating it, and he will bomb.  But all the signs show that he is going to be a definite favorite come next year for the Republican presidential primary.

From Fox News

This past week, news broke that two American aide workers, who were working in Africa had contracted the ebola virus.  Pres. Obama, without seeming to bat an eye, rallied support from the military and the CDC to get a special jet sent over with a team ready to bring them back.  These Americans will be the first people ever to be treated with the ebola virus in America.  

At this moment there is already one being treated at an Atlanta hospital.  Little news has been given on his status.

This event, is in very stark contrast compared to other situations in which the president has acted very minimally, or not at all.  There is one case in particular that continues to stand out.  Benghazi.

In Benghazi we had four Americans fighting for their lives against terrorists who were bombing and shooting at the CIA Annex.  They fought for seven hours, staying alive and asking for help.  All they got from the White House was an order to stand down and that they could do nothing.  Even though we had troops at the ready in Tripoli and off the coast in the Mediterranean Sea, there was supposedly nothing that we could do to save them, for seven hours.

They have tried to gloss over the glaring facts, and give a story that reeks of lies.  The story has been mangled from the beginning, with the president claiming he could not do anything, and then jetting off to a fundraiser in Las Vegas.  While then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice went around saying that the attack had been the result of extremists being upset with a youtube video, which we have found since then, was an outright lie.

The point here is that Pres. Obama, in many situations has acted in a very opportunistic manner.  In sending in support to bring home Americans stricken with ebola he is seeking to earn some positive media.  But in the other cases, there was supposedly no opportunity to save them, which in most of the situations is a lie.

When it comes to hard situations, in which there will be unpopular decisions to be made, the president and his team make the oddest choices.  Which is to either not do anything, or do the least as possible and then spin it hard into a positive.  

I hope one day that Pres. Obama will see the light, or make a good decision for once.  But with 2 years left it is looking less and less likely.

Posted by: Shawn_the_Writer | May 22, 2014

Rep. Joe Garcia: “We’ve Proved that Communism Works.”

Recently, Congressman Joe Garcia, a congressman who represents Florida’s 26th congressional district, made a statement about communism recently.

In a Google Hangout he spoke with supporters about immigration reform, and got onto communism.  His comment was this. “We’ve proved that communism works.”

Watch the video below for his full comments:

One person who commented on the video had this to say:

 As someone who grew up in Communist occupied Poland, who’s land was stolen by the government in the name of collective common good and classless society, anyone who says “communism works” deserves a one way ticket to North Korea.
At least now there are Democrats who are no longer hiding the fact that they favor communism and believe that it is a great method.
Posted by: Shawn_the_Writer | May 14, 2014

Trey Gowdy Takes Down The Media In Just 3 Minutes

In a press conference this past weekend on the Benghazi select committee that was recently approved.  Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, who is the chairman of the committee spoke directly to the media, and gave them a verbal smack down.

He started off with quoting the president on Benghazi and how he said that “justice will be done”, and “We’re investigating exactly what happened, but my biggest priority now is bringing those folks to justice”.  Stressing that both statements by the president were made over 1 year ago.

Then went straight into the questioning the reporters.  Below is a video of Rep. Gowdy silencing media reporters in just three minutes.

 

Rep. Trey Gowdy is exactly the type of person we need in DC to be the blunt and truthful person who doesn’t care if the truth is going to hurt you.  And who is not afraid to step up and make unpopular comments.  We need more representatives and politicians like Mr. Gowdy, then we would have true transparency and actually know what the truth of what is going on.

And if you thought that the press conference was something to watch, then I highly suggest you plan to watch the hearings on Benghazi, because it is going to be a do not miss hearing.  I have a feeling that Trey Gowdy is going to be very successful in helping further shed light on Benghazi.

In a new ad put out by Pennsylvania State Treasurer Rob McCord this week, he goes after Tom Wolf by name, and hints at Allyson Schwartz and Katie McGinty.  All of whom are currently in what is quickly becoming a heated race for the Democratic nomination for Governor.

McCord, who is already known to not be on good terms with Congresswoman Allyson Schwartz, has chosen to pick out Tom Wolf, (a businessman from York County) who is currently leading the pack of candidates.  In the ad, titled ‘Sucker’, McCord says that “Tom Wolf and the others would leave hundreds of millions of dollars in the Drillers’ pockets.  That’s a bad deal for Pennsylvania.  I’m tired of being played for a sucker.”  This marks the first time in this primary race that a candidate has gone negative against their opponent.  Wolf, Schwartz and McGinty have all put out rather positive and pleasant add’s, while McCord has chosen to take a more blunt path.  View the ad below-

Also, mentioned in the ad, is his plan to put a 10% tax on drillers in the state.  A terrible plan that will chase good jobs and companies away that this state so desperately needs.

I have a strong suspicion that this will backfire on him, which is not a good thing since he has been found landing in 3rd place among the majority of polling data that has been done by Franklin & Marshall and Harper, only garnering 8%.  While Wolf continues to lead the pack with a 40% lead (PA Democrat Primary Data-RCP).

If there is  anything that I have learned over my years of helping campaigns and watching elections, it is that people aren’t all that fond of politicians when they go negative.  Especially when they feel they have been berated with it in the past, and most certainly when there is a candidate who can claim the role of non-politician in the race, and appear to rise above the fray.

Though honestly, this was always McCord’s race to lose as he stood up against an uphill battle with just Allyson Schwartz in the race.  Then Wolf entered and crushed any chances he had.  This Democratic primary race is now between the Congresswoman and the businessman.

There have been many articles and much shared words on blogs and throughout social media.  So I just humbly offer my thoughts into the pool of the many given.

This past week, Brendan Eich resigned as CEO of Mozilla as most of you are probably well aware.  He left over internal and external pressure, because in 2008 he donated to help Proposition 8 in California, a proposition which defines marriage between a man and a woman.

I find myself this week, agreeing with some gay rights activists on this story.  Sure we may not agree, but shutting anyone out is a very wrong thing to do.  We all have the right to free speech, to speak of our beliefs freely without being silenced.  That is what our founding fathers wanted for our nation, knowing that where they had come from, limiting speech was wrong.

One gay rights activist said this week that the actions taken by Mozilla and gay rights individuals makes them no better than the anti-gay rights campaigns of the past, working to shut up the opposition.  This is the wrong way to go about things.

Though I am a devout Catholic, and hold firm to my beliefs.  I still believe that we all in this nation should retain the right to whatever they believe.  Whether they be gay, straight, Catholic, Atheist.  Even CEO’s, business owners, store clerks and servers.  We all share the same rights to hold fast to our own beliefs.  Do I agree with everyone?  No.  But does that mean I should cut off their right to free speech?  Certainly not.

We must come to an understanding in this country that we are all created equal, it’s in the very words our founding fathers handed down to us in the Constitution.  Only when we wash away the stain of political correctness which has plagued this nation for years can we see each other clearly, and maybe then we can come to an understanding.

Political correctness get’s in the way of moving our nation forward.  It is a belief that is hurting the free speech that we have.  Shutting someone out because their words might ‘offend’ or ‘hurt’ an individuals or groups feelings is what brings us down.

Once we eradicate political correctness, it will help us take a step forward.

After all.  Free speech is there to protect the people we perceive as crazy or stupid.  If the crazy man on the corner no longer has a right to speak freely.  Then we have lost.

 

Rick Santorum, the former Pennsylvania Senator and 2012 Presidential Candidate, is returning this week to Iowa.  A state which he won against eventual nominee Mitt Romney in a long fought race.  He will be in the state for a jam-packed 24 hours in which he will be holding a press gaggle with reporters and will be headlining a fundraiser for Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz who is running for Congress.

This busy day in Iowa comes just after Rick’s group Patriot Voices released a new web ad that goes after Pres. Obama, and as stated in their press release, that highlights how despite the dramatic events and foreign policy challenges our country is facing, President Obama seems to care more about becoming a pop culture icon than a serious Commander-in-Chief.”

<iframe width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”//www.youtube.com/embed/vUa-xaAjxhw” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen>

 

The ad does a very good job at hitting the presidents celebrity status that he has chosen to foster over his role of being Commander and Chief to this nation.  If you agree that we need to take foreign policy seriously, and our leaders especially need to protect our foreign interests, than please sign your name on the video page HERE.

It is important that we demand responsibility from our elected officials.  We are the people, the power that voted them into office, and they should take our demands very seriously.

Also, this Iowa stop helps further confirms suspicions that Rick Santorum is seriously considering running for President again in 2016.  And whether the national media realizes it yet or not, a Santorum candidacy could very well lead to a Santorum presidency.  There was another candidate who no one thought much of after he won 11 states, and then went on to become the next president of the United States.  And what was his name?

Ronald Reagan.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane at a news conference with Mayor Nutter in February. This month, Kane spoke to several dozen women in Philadelphia at a daylong training session put on by Emily's List, which aims to elect more Democratic women.

This month, news broke that Pennsylvania’s Attorney General Kathleen Kane, closed a case that had been conducted during Tom Corbett’s time as AG, that revealed several members of the state legislature that accepted bribes for votes and contracts.

Kane stated that the case was “poorly conceived, badly managed and tainted by racism”.  The racism she speaks of stems from the fact that the only legislators caught in the investigation are African-American.

Though Kane and her office state the reason for dropping case because it was racist and ill-conceived, will not fly for long.  The state of Pennsylvania voted for her in part because David Freed was caught up in the mess left behind Gov. Corbett with the unsolved Sandusky case.  It is a known fact that Pennsylvania don’t have a high tolerance for mismanaged and dropped cases that should be a priority.

Also, Kane will have a harder time dropping this issue now that a government ethics group in Philadelphia is calling for the Pennsylvania state legislature to create an independent council to conduct a fair and non-partisan investigation into the dismissed sting operation.  And likely more individuals and groups will request that this be looked into.

This is all becoming a headache for Kane, who has been reportedly seriously looking at running for Senate in 2016.  She did have a very good shot at gliding through the primary and probably would have handily won against incumbent Sen. Pat Toomey who was elected by barely two percent.  But with this recent scandal, her reputation with Pennsylvania voters has been tarnished.

Unless she makes a full 180 on this case, instead of protecting her fellow Democrats, she will lose.  Kane has to rise above the fray and party politics if she even wants a good shot at winning re-election if she chooses not to run for senate.  In any case, this has hurt her reputation with voters and she have a hard time climbing over this hurdle in the next election cycle.

Posted by: Shawn_the_Writer | March 23, 2014

Computers Can’t Hire People

Throughout the past several months, I have been applying for jobs, at grocery stores and other places.  But through all of my applying and talking with people.  I’ve only had one interview, and almost every other place has not given any response (the responses that I have gotten are emails).

The big issue I’ve found when applying online.  Is that you take questionnaires, that are supposed to tell the management something about you, and in some cases, if you don’t answer the questions in the right way, then you don’t get put through the system at all.

Computers are wonderful, social media is great.  But these impersonal ways of communication are being used by companies to hire people, and this is something that does not seem to be working.  At least for business’ around me.

There is a gas station down the road called Sheetz, a place where I’ve applied at several times and would love to work at.  But because of the system, the manager, who at the time needed several new team members, could not hire me without having me go through the application process.  And if, as I mentioned, you do not answer the questions correctly, you do not get put through.  This isn’t then just an applicants issue, but an issue for managers who are trying to hire people, and can only interview people who the system deems appropriate for the job.

My big issue that I’m getting at is that computers do not know people, and cannot sense emotions and character.  Only another human beings can do that.  So, though computers are convenient, I would highly encourage companies to look into other avenues for hiring people.

Maybe there are benefits to this system that I have yet to see, but from my current vantage point I see none.  And I welcome opinions, so if you have a view-point different from mine than I invite you to please comment about it below.

Until then, I will continue to keep applying and work odd jobs.  Hopefully at some point soon, I will find the gainful employment that I seek.

Older Posts »

Categories

%d bloggers like this: